Insights by OmkarKriya

Accuracy

Audited. Honestly.

Worst-case residuals against JPL Horizons across nine reference dates spanning 1899–2101. Sub-arcsec on every body except the geometric Moon — that residual is the published MPP02-vs-DE441 ceiling, and we say so out loud below.

Worst-case residuals

Body by body.

Vs. JPL Horizons.

BodyWorst |dλ|Method
Sun<0.1″VSOP87D Earth heliocentric + FK5 + IAU 1980 nutation + aberration
Moon (apparent)0.87″Home-grown ELP/MPP02 (Chapront & Francou 2003) full 35,901-term series
Moon (geometric)21″Same — DE405/406-fit ceiling vs DE441 (see ceiling doc)
Mercury0.10″VSOP87D
Venus0.11″VSOP87D
Mars0.10″VSOP87D
Jupiter0.22″VSOP87D
Saturn0.46″VSOP87D
Uranus1.1″VSOP87D
Neptune2.4″VSOP87D
Pluto0.04″DOPRI8 8(7) n-body, 9-perturber, JPL Horizons J2000 seed
Ceres1.5″Same integrator
Pallas2.84″Same integrator
Juno0.46″Same integrator
Vesta2.8″Same integrator
Chiron0.06″Same integrator
Pholus0.05″Same integrator
Nessus0.08″Same integrator
Eris0.09″Same integrator
Haumea0.05″Same integrator
Makemake0.05″Same integrator
Sedna0.10″Same integrator
Quaoar0.04″Same integrator

Live data: /api/v1/accuracy serves the same residuals as JSON for any tooling that wants to verify on every release. Engine version: 9.13.0.

Honest disclosure

The Moon ceiling.

The 21″ geometric-Moon astrometric residual is the DE405/406-fit ceiling shared by every analytical lunar theory in the world that traces back to MPP02 or LEA-406. DE441 (the modern reference) shifted the lunar trajectory by ~10–21″ depending on epoch — no analytical theory fitted to DE-405 can close that gap. We tested the two paths that close it (parameter refit, alternative theory) and shipped the negative result instead of glossing over it.

Production callers hit moonApparentEcliptic (apparent mode), where the Moon is sub-arcsec because the engine's nutation is added correctly. The 21″ only surfaces if you specifically ask for the geometric mean position. The full write-up is at docs/MOON_CEILING.md — including the two paths that close the gap (DE441 binary refit; numerical Moon integration) for any customer who needs sub-arcsec geometric Moon enough to pay for the multi-week engineering it takes.

Source of truth

No black box.

Every coefficient is cited.

VSOP87D

IMCCE — Bureau des longitudes (Paris)

ELP/MPP02

Chapront & Francou 2003, A&A 404, 735 — DE405/406 fit

ELP2000-82B

Chapront-Touzé & Chapront 1988 — alternative Moon evaluator

JPL Horizons

NASA/JPL — J2000 state vectors for every integrated body

IAU 1980 Nutation

Wahr 1981, Seidelmann 1982 — top 15 + extension terms

Meeus, Astronomical Algorithms

Willmann-Bell 1998 — every classical chapter

Standish/JPL Keplerian elements

JPL SSD — outer-span fallback on integrated bodies

Doctrine attributions live in SOURCES.md — pre-1929 public-domain only, every traditional rule traced to its primary source (Ptolemy, Vettius Valens, Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra, etc.). No copyrighted modern interpretations are baked in.